Enhancing the European Social Model

SCHEME: RESCOM

CALL: 2016

DOMAIN: LE - Law, Economics, Finance

FIRST NAME: Luca

LAST NAME: Ratti

INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP / PPP: No

INDUSTRY / PPP PARTNER:

HOST INSTITUTION: University of Luxembourg

KEYWORDS:

START: 2016-11-07

END: 2017-06-30

WEBSITE: https://www.uni.lu

Submitted Abstract

The Lecture Series “Enhancing the European Social Model” has considered the foundational concepts of EU labour and social law, focusing on the so-called ESM. Starting with the first Lecture on the concept of subordination, the series has been animated by the participation as lecturers of the following distinguished scholars: – Nicola COUNTOURIS (UCL London) and Franck LECOMTE (CJEU): 11 November 2016, The Subordination Dilemma and the Scope of EU labour law. – Filip DORSSEMONT (UC Louvain): 26 January 2017, L’Europe face à l’autonomie collective. The Right to Collective Bargaining in EU, Between the CJEU and the ECHR- Edoardo ALES (Univ. of Cassino): 3 February 2017: Migrant Workers and Social Security in EU after Commission v UK (C-308/14) and the Brexit referendum.- José Maria MIRANDA BOTO (University of Santiago de Compostela): 31 March 2017, The Future of Collective Labour Law in EU: Representation, Collective Bargaining and the Right to Strike.- Achim SEIFERT (Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena): 28 April 2017, General Data Protection Regulation and the Employment Relationship.- Valerio DE STEFANO (Bocconi University and ILO Geneva [now University of Leuven]): 26 May 2017, New Media, New Jobs in the Digital Economy: Questions on the Regulation of Crowdwork in EU.- Catherine BARNARD (Cambridge University) and Francois BILTGEN (CJEU), 19 June 2017, The Future of the European Social Model: Trends and Challenges.All the events have been massively advertised via internet and with posters.Examples here: https://wwwen.uni.lu/fdef/actualites/enhancing_the_european_social_modelAll the lectures have been participated by a stimulating audience, who continuously appreciated the high level of the speakers and the intensity of the debate thereof.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the use of cookies for analytics purposes. Find out more in our Privacy Statement